Skip to main content

Table 1 Multivariate analysis showing factors associated with brucellosis during the prospective study (January 2013 – February 2013)

From: Annual trends of human brucellosis in pastoralist communities of south-western Uganda: a retrospective ten-year study

 

Brucellosis results, n (%)

Unadjusted RR(95 % CI)

Adjusted RR(95 % CI)

P-value

Variables

Negative 416(68.2 %)

Positive 194(31.8 %)

   

Age

 0–18

38(9.1)

23(11.9)

1

1

 

 19–30

168(40.4)

76(39.2)

0.83(0.57–1.20)

0.77(0.53–1.12)

0.18

 31–45

128(30.8)

69(35.6)

0.94(0.65–1.37)

0.86(0.58–1.26)

0.44

 46–60

65(15.6)

17(8.8)

0.54(0.32–0.94)

0.50(0.29–0.84)

0.01*

 +61

17(4.1)

9(4.6)

0.92(0.49–1.70)

0.83(0.45–1.51)

0.54

Sex

 Male

153(36.8)

60(30.9)

1

1

 

 Female

263(63.2)

134(69.1)

1.21(0.93–1.57)

0.81(0.63–1.04)

0.10

Occupation

 Farmer

142(34.1)

68(35.1)

1

1

 

 Agro-pastoralist

66(15.9)

41(21.1)

1.17(0.86–1.59)

0.81(0.48–1.38)

0.44

 Pastoralists

14(3.4)

9(4.6)

1.19(0.69–2.05)

0.89(0.52–1.53)

0.68

 Others

194(46.6)

76(39.2)

0.85(0.65–0.12)

0.66(0.39–1.12)

0.12

Malaria results

 Negative

381(91.6)

166(85.6)

1

1

 

 Positive

35(8.4)

28(14.4)

0.94(0.56-1.03)

2.29(0.68–1.31)

0.73

Typhoid test

 Negative

405(97.4)

120(61.9)

1

1

 

 Positive

11(2.6)

74(38.1)

0.67(0.53–0.87)

0.68(0.52–0.89)

<0.005*

  1. RR Risk ratio
  2. * means level of significance <0.05