From: Factors that determine catastrophic expenditure for tuberculosis care: a patient survey in China
Catastrophic expenditure | % of household income | % of non-food expenditure | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 % | 25 % | 40 % | 10 % | 25 % | 40 % | |
Head Count (HC,%) | ||||||
Q1a | 94.1 | 83.2 | 71.8 | 94.8 | 82.2 | 71.2 |
Q2 | 82.6 | 48.8 | 28.9 | 90.8 | 75.6 | 63.9 |
Q3 | 63.4 | 30.1 | 19.6 | 84.1 | 59.6 | 50.3 |
Q4 | 41.3 | 15.9 | 8.9 | 81.5 | 55.1 | 40.8 |
Total | 66.8 | 42.3 | 31.3 | 87.1 | 66.5 | 54.7 |
P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Mean Catastrophic Payment Gap (%) | ||||||
Q1 | 111.2 | 98.0 | 86.9 | 117.4 | 104.3 | 93.2 |
Q2 | 32.4 | 22.0 | 16.4 | 67.6 | 55.5 | 45.4 |
Q3 | 22.6 | 15.2 | 11.5 | 55.9 | 45.6 | 37.5 |
Q4 | 9.1 | 5.1 | 3.3 | 51.9 | 41.8 | 34.7 |
Total | 40.8 | 32.8 | 27.7 | 72.0 | 60.9 | 52.1 |
Mean Positive Gap (%) | ||||||
Q1 | 119.3 | 121.7 | 129.6 | 124.5 | 129.6 | 136.3 |
Q2 | 39.3 | 45.6 | 58.0 | 74.9 | 74.6 | 73.3 |
Q3 | 35.6 | 50.5 | 58.8 | 66.6 | 77.3 | 75.4 |
Q4 | 22.0 | 32.4 | 37.7 | 63.7 | 76.2 | 85.7 |
Total | 62.2 | 81.8 | 96.3 | 83.2 | 93.2 | 98.3 |