Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Increased circulating level of interleukin-6 and CD8+ T cell exhaustion are associated with progression of COVID-19

Infectious Diseases of Poverty volume 9, Article number: 161 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is pandemic. It is critical to identify COVID-19 patients who are most likely to develop a severe disease. This study was designed to determine the clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 patients associated with the development of pneumonia and factors associated with disease progression.

Methods

Seventy consecutive patients with etiologically confirmed COVID-19 admitted to PLA General Hospital in Beijing, China from December 27, 2019 to March 12, 2020 were enrolled in this study and followed-up to March 16, 2020. Differences in clinical and laboratory findings between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without were determined by the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test (categorical variables) and independent group t test or Mann–Whitney U test (continuous variables). The Cox proportional hazard model and Generalized Estimating Equations were applied to evaluate factors that predicted the progression of COVID-19.

Results

The mean incubation was 8.67 (95% confidence interval, 6.78–10.56) days. Mean duration from the first test severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-positive to conversion was 11.38 (9.86–12.90) days. Compared to pneumonia-free patients, pneumonia patients were 16.5 years older and had higher frequencies of having hypertension, fever, and cough and higher circulating levels of neutrophil proportion, interleukin-6, low count (< 190/µl) of CD8+ T cells, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Thirteen patients deteriorated during hospitalization. Cox regression analysis indicated that older age and higher serum levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate at admission significantly predicted the progression of COVID-19. During hospitalization, circulating counts of T lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells were lower, whereas neutrophil proportion, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and the circulating levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were higher, in pneumonia patients than in pneumonia-free patients. CD8+ lymphocyte count in pneumonia patients did not recover when discharged.

Conclusions

Older age and higher levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitionin, interleukin-6, and lactate might predict COVID-19 progression. T lymphocyte, especially CD8+ cell-mediated immunity is critical in recovery of COVID-19. This study may help in predicting disease progression and designing immunotherapy for COVID-19.

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is being pandemic in 2020 [1,2,3,4]. As of November 6, 2020, a total of 48 534 508 cases and 1 231 017 deaths were reported globally [5]. Clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 differs greatly, ranging from asymptomatic and mild symptoms including hyposmia to fatal pneumonia [4, 6]. Approximately 80% of COVID-19 cases have mild disease, 20% require hospital admission, and 5% require intensive care admission [7]. Approximately, 31.25–66.67% of early COVID-19 cases do not have radiographic pneumonia, pneumonia detected by radiographic image [8, 9]. It is critical to identify COVID-19 patients who are most likely to have poor outcomes [10]. Differences in the epidemiological and clinical features between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without are initiatory to recognize patients who are more likely to develop progressive diseases. To determine the factors that predict the progression of COVID-19 in a prospective study is critical for the development of suitable prophylactic options. However, these prognostic factors remain largely unknown. Furthermore, the course of COVID-19 and the duration of viral shedding, which reflect the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with host immunity, remain to be further clarified. Here, we report a series of cases admitted into an infectious disease hospital that is responsible for quarantine and treatment of COVID-19 assigned by the government of Beijing, China.

Methods

Patients enrollment

This case series was approved by the institutional ethics board of Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, with orally informed consents. All consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from December 27, 2019 to March 12, 2020 were enrolled. Patients with suspected COVID-19 were admitted to this center and quarantined. Respiratory samples including throat swab samples were detected for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as previously described [1, 2, 4]. Epidemiological information was obtained from person-to-person interview for exposure history in the past 2–3 weeks. Incubation duration was calculated in the cases with clear time points of exposure and illness onset. Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics as well as therapeutic activities and outcomes were collected. Pneumonia was diagnosed by chest computerized tomography scan. All patients received blood test at the 1st day when admitted into the study hospital. The test was mostly repeated every 2–4 days during hospitalization according to patient’s condition or every day if COVID-19 deteriorated. The total leukocyte and percentages of neutrophils and lymphocyte in peripheral blood were measured on an automatic hematology analyzer HN-2000 series (SYSMEX, Kobe, Japan). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose, triglyceride, and lactate were measured on an automatic biochemical analyzer AU5400 (BECKMAN COULTER, Brea, CA). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and procalcitonin were examined using Roch cobas 8000 (Roche Disgnostics GmbH, Mannheim, GER). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was measured by an automatic ESR analyzer VACUETTE (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). Lymphocyte count and subsets were measured using a cytometry FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Becton, NJ). Parameters of respiration were measured using a blood gas analyzer OPTI CCA-TS (OPTI Medical Systems, Roswell, GA). COVID-19 was re-diagnosed according to the Protocol for the Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19 (Version 7th), National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China [11]. Briefly, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed if patient’s respiratory sample was positive for SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA. All diagnosed COVID-19 patients were classified as mild, common, severe, and extremely severe types. Mild type was defined if COVID-19 patient had mild symptoms but did not have radiographic pneumonia. Common type was identified if COVID-19 patient had fever, respiratory symptoms, and radiographic pneumonia. Severe type was diagnosed if COVID-19 patient with pneumonia met one of the following criteria: respiratory rate ≥ 30 times/min, resting oxygen saturation ≤ 93%, and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤ 300 mmHg. Extremely severe type met one of the following criteria: respiratory failure that needs mechanical ventilation, shock, and combined organ failure that need to be treated in intensive care unit. Patients were discharged from hospital if they met the criteria: temperature normalized for ≥ 3 days, apparent improvement in respiratory symptoms, absorption of pneumonia, and negative SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA tested for twice at 1 day interval. The final date of follow-up was March 16, 2020.

Factors associated with the presence of pneumonia and COVID-19 progression-predicting factors

Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were described using mean, median, and interquartile range (IQR) values and compared using independent group t test or Mann–Whitney U test. The Cox proportional hazard model was applied to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Due to the small sample size, the analyses were not adjusted for multiple comparisons, given the potential for type I error. Differences in the daily medians of laboratory parameters between patients with and without pneumonia in the 20 consecutive days were evaluated using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Above statistical analyses were two-sided and performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) version 21.0 software. The dynamic diagrams and the trend of each laboratory parameter fitted by local polynomial regression were generated by R software (version 3.6.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Canberra, Austria). A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Epidemiological characteristics

Seventy consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled in this study. Of those, 33 (47.1%) had direct exposure and 24 (34.3%) had an indirect exposure to Wuhan within 14 days before disease onset. The patients included two family clustering cases (Additional file 1: Fig. 1). Confirmed cases kept increasing since January 10, reached the peak on January 22, 2020. Ten days after the Wuhan quarantine, the curve touched the bottom. Thereafter, 3 cases came from other countries (Additional file 2: Fig. 2). The mean (95% CI) incubation period of COVID-19 was 8.67 (6.78–10.56) days in 42 cases with clear time points of exposure and illness onset. The incubation was 8.35 (5.15–11.56) days in patients without pneumonia and 8.88 (6.37–11.39) days in patients with pneumonia.

Of the 70 patients, 62 were discharged. One co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) was excluded from the analysis because of known aberrant immunity. The mean (95% CI) duration from the first SARS-CoV-2-positive test to RT-PCR conversion in the remaining 61 cases was 11.38 (9.86–12.90) days.

Clinical and laboratory parameters of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without when just hospitalized

The median age was 45.0 years (IQR: 34.5–61.0; range: 3–85 years), and 32 (45.7%) were women. Major symptoms at disease onset were fever (84.3%), cough (51.4%), fatigue (28.6%), expectoration (22.9%), sore throat (20.0%), and myalgia (18.6%). Of the 70 patients, 38 (54.3%) had at least one coexisting health conditions. Hypertension (24.3%) and diabetes (10.0%) were the most common ones.

The numbers of mild, common, severe, and extremely severe patients identified at the time of being admitted were 22, 32, 15, and 1, respectively. Common, severe, and extremely severe types were combined as COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. Compared to patients without pneumonia, patients with pneumonia were 16.5 years older and had higher rates of hypertension, fever, and cough and longer fever duration (Table 1). Laboratory examinations showed that pneumonia patients had higher circulating levels of neutrophils proportion, IL-6, very low count (< 190/µl) of CD8+ T cells, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) than did pneumonia-free COVID-19 patients at the 1st day after admission to hospital (Table 2).

Table 1 Baseline information of COVID-19 patients enrolled in this study
Full size table
Table 2 Comparison of laboratory findings at the admission between COVID-19 patients with and without pneumonia
Full size table

Disease course

Of the 70 patients, 67 received interferon spray, 61 received antiviral treatments with lopinavir/ritonavir and or arbidol. In 69 patients (except the one co-infected with HIV and HBV), the mean (95% CI) duration from disease onset to being admitted was 7.88 (6.29–9.48) days [5.91 (3.69–8.13) days in pneumonia-free patients and 8.81 (6.71–10.90) in pneumonia patients] and the mean duration from illness onset to being discharged from hospital was 26.30 (23.47–29.12) days [21.09 (16.37–25.81) days in pneumonia-free patients and 29.23 (25.91–32.55) days in pneumonia patients]. Thus, disease course of COVID-19 was approximately 3–4 weeks.

Factors predicting disease progression

During hospital stay, two cases with mild-type COVID-19 progressed to be common-type COVID-19, 11 severe-type patients deteriorated to be extremely severe-type COVID-19. Of the 11 patients, three died of COVID-19. The 13 cases were categorized as having progressive diseases. Cox regression analysis including the parameters differed between patients with pneumonia and those without indicated that older age and circulating levels of IL-6, CRP, procalcitonin, and lactate at the 1st day after admission to hospital significantly predicted the progression of COVID-19 (Table 3).

Table 3 Cox regression analyses for factors predicting the progression of COVID-19
Full size table

We re-categorized patients who developed pneumonia and then evaluated the dynamics of clinical and laboratory parameters during hospital stay between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without pneumonia. Of the parameters evaluated, 9 showed significantly different trends between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without. During the course of COVID-19, neutrophil proportion (PGEE < 0.001), NLR (PGEE < 0.001), and serum levels of CRP (PGEE = 0.024), ESR (PGEE = 0.003), and IL-6 (PGEE = 0.043) were significantly higher in pneumonia patients than pneumonia-free patients, which were quite in contrast to lymphocyte proportion (PGEE < 0.001), T lymphocyte count (PGEE < 0.001), CD4+ T lymphocyte count (PGEE < 0.001), and CD8+ T lymphocyte count (PGEE = 0.001). B lymphocyte count did not change between patients with pneumonia and those without. At the 20th day after illness onset, the dynamic curves of neutrophil proportion, CD4+ T lymphocyte count, and the levels of CRP, ESR, IL-6, and procalcitonin between patients with pneumonia and those without tended to meet (P > 0.05); however, the two curves of CD8+ T lymphocyte counts kept separated (P < 0.05) (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dynamic curves of lymphocytes and its subsets between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without pneumonia. Daily medians of laboratory parameters within the first 20 days were applied to construct the dynamic curves. PGEE indicated statistic difference in the daily medians of each laboratory parameter between patients with and without pneumonia during the 20 consecutive days. P value indicates the difference in each laboratory parameter between patients with and without pneumonia at the 20th day since illness onset (Mann–Whitney U test)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Dynamic curves of other inflammatory factors between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without pneumonia. Daily medians of the parameters within the first 20 days were applied to construct the dynamic curves. PGEE indicated statistic difference in the daily medians of each laboratory parameter between patients with and without pneumonia during the 20 consecutive days. P value indicates the difference in each laboratory parameter between patients with and without pneumonia at the 20th day since illness onset (Mann–Whitney U test). CRP C-reactive protein; ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IL-6 interleukin-6; NLR neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, most patients had clear exposure history, indicating close contact via droplets was the major way of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in low epidemic regions. The mean incubation of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 8.67 days. A previous study carried out in Wuhan indicated that the mean incubation was 5.2 days [2]. Patients identified at the early stage of the outbreak in Wuhan mostly had severe pneumonia and might be exposed to higher viral concentration in closed spaces like the affected hospitals. As asymptomatic carriers might transmit SARS-CoV-2, person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 should occur earlier than do SARS-CoV [12, 13]. Quarantine of close contactors and social distancing are necessary during COVID-19 pandemic. The incubation duration from this study should be important in quarantining close contactors.

We determined that the mean duration from onset to discharge was 26.30 days. The course of COVID-19 is approximately 3–4 weeks, which is longer than severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (approximately 2 weeks) [14]. The mean duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding might be 20 days, which is not shorter than SARS-CoV [15]. A just finished clinical study in Shanghai, China, did not show any therapeutic effect of lopinavir/ritonavir or abidol on accelerating the clearance of SARS-CoV-2 [16]. These evidences imply that the interaction of host immunity with SARS-CoV-2 infection, rather than the current antiviral regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol, alters the course of COVID-19.

To identify the factors that can indicate progressive COVID-19, we characterized the differences in clinical features and laboratory findings between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without pneumonia firstly. It was found that older age and underlying hypertension were significantly associated with the risk of developing pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2 infection in elders with underlying medical conditions including hypertension often results in serious consequences, which is quite in accordance with SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) [13]. Specific prophylaxis should be given to this vulnerable population. Higher proportion of neutrophil, lower proportion of lymphocytes, lower T cell count, and higher serum level of IL-6 were significantly associated with the risk of developing pneumonia. Unlike those without pneumonia, one-third of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia had very low account (< 190/µl) of CD8+ T cells. These data suggest that CD8+ T cell exhaustion and IL-6-based inflammation play an important role in COVID-19 progression. As some COVID-19 patients progress rapidly [17], we evaluated the effect of factors including those differed between COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and those without in the cross-sectional study on disease progression in a prospective study. It was identified that serum IL-6, CRP, procalcitonin, and lactate at the time of being admitted to hospital predicted poor outcomes of COVID-19. IL-6 is capable of inhibiting the T cell-mediated immunity, and high level of IL-6 in the acute stage is associated with lung lesions in SARS patients [18]. CRP, an acute inflammatory protein, plays important roles in inflammatory processes and host responses to infection [19]. Procalcitonin reflects bacterial infections [20]. High level of procalcitonin indicates the possibility of secondary bacterial infection. Superinfections with bacteria during hospitalization are significantly related to worse outcomes of COVID-19 patients [21]. Lactate, a natural by-product of aerobic glycolysis, can promote the switch of CD4+ T cells to an IL-17+ subset and impairs the cytolytic capacity of CD8+ T cells [22]. Thus, IL-6 and lactate might bridge SARS-CoV-2 infection and alveolar cell injury via inducing tissue-damaging inflammation, and impairs the CD8+ T cell-mediated antiviral immunity.

For the first time, the dynamics of immune and inflammatory factors were evaluated during hospitalization of COVID-19 patients. Neutrophil proportion, NLR, IL-6, ESR, CRP, and procalcitonin were generally higher in the pneumonia patients than in the pneumonia-free patients, in contrast to CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocyte counts. Interestingly, CD4+ T lymphocyte counts recover rapidly, whereas CD8+ T lymphocyte cells in pneumonia patients did not recover at the 20th day, indicating that recovery of CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity needs a longer time. Thus, the discharged patients need extensive medical care. A recent study carried out in Germany has demonstrated that reappearance of effector T cells is associated with COVID-19 recovery [23]. Thus, the recovery of T cells count, especially CD8+ T cell count should be extensively monitored after being discharged. According to the results of this study, we suggest that patients with severe COVID-19 or patients bearing the risk of developing severe COVID-19 may benefit from immunotherapy with autologous CD8+ T lymphocytes and/or cytokine up-regulating the number and function of CD8+ T lymphocytes. Although interferon was suggested for the treatment of COVID-19 [24, 25], immunotherapy to up-regulate CD8+ T lymphocytes has not been established. Thus, this study may help in designing immunotherapy for COVID-19.

Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small, which limited further statistical analysis. Second, the course of severe patients might be prolonged by therapeutic regimens including corticosteroids [26].

Conclusions

Old age, hypertension, higher circulating levels of neutrophils, IL-6, and NLR and lower levels of T lymphocytes, CD4+ lymphocytes, and CD8+ T cells were significantly associated with the risk of developing pneumonia. In patients with COVID-19, disease progression is significantly associated with older age and higher circulating levels of CRP, procalcitionin, IL-6, and lactate. T lymphocyte, especially CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity is important in recovery of COVID-19. This study may help not only in predicting disease progression but also in designing immunotherapy for COVID-19.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

CRP:

Serum C-reactive protein

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

PaO2 :

Arterial partial pressure of oxygen

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

NLR:

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

GEE:

Generalized Estimating Equations

References

  1. Zhu N, Zhang DY, Wang WL, Li XW, Yang B, Song JD, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Q, Guan XH, Wu P, Wang XY, Zhou L, Tong YQ, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang DW, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu FF, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan. China JAMA. 2020;323:1061–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. Weekly operational update on COVID-19—6 November 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19---6-november-2020.

  6. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu YJ, Mao YP, Ye RX, Wang QZ, Sun C, Sylvia S, Rozelle S, Raat H, Zhou H. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cevik M, Bamford CGG, Ho A. COVID-19 pandemic—a focused review for clinicians. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:842–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu J, Liu J, Zhao X, Liu CY, Wang W, Wang DW, et al. Clinical characteristics of imported cases of COVID-19 in Jiangsu Province: a multicenter descriptive study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:706–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon SH, Lee KH, Kim JY, Lee YK, Ko H, Kim KH, et al. Chest radiographic and CT findings of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): analysis of nine patients treated in Korea. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21:494–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipsitch M, Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Defining the epidemiology of Covid-19—studies needed. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1194–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for COVID-19. Trial Version 7, 2020. http://en.nhc.gov.cn/2020-03/29/c_78469.htm.

  12. Huff HV, Singh A. Asymptomatic transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for public health strategies. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/cid/ciaa654.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hui DS, Memish ZA, Zumla A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome vs. the Middle East respiratory syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20:233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avendano M, Derkach P, Swan S. Clinical course and management of SARS in health care workers in Toronto: a case series. CMAJ. 2003;168:1649–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu CM, Leung WS, Cheng VC, Chan KH, Lin AW, Chan VL, et al. Duration of RT-PCR positivity in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2005;25:12–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen J, Ling Y, Xi XH, Liu P, Li F, Li T, et al. Efficacies of lopinavir/ritonavir and abidol in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Infect Dis. 2020;38:E008 ((in Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, Cao YK, Alwalid O, Gu J, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:425–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshikawa T, Hill T, Li K, Peters CJ, Tseng CT. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus-induced lung epithelial cytokines exacerbate SARS pathogenesis by modulating intrinsic functions of monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells. J Virol. 2009;83:3039–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ. Role of C-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aloisio E, Dolci A, Panteghini M. Procalcitonin: between evidence and critical issues. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;496:7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia-Vidal C, Sanjuan G, Moreno-García E, Puerta-Alcalde P, Garcia-Pouton N, Chumbita M, et al. Incidence of co-infections and superinfections in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pucino V, Bombardieri M, Pitzalis C, Mauro C. Lactate at the crossroads of metabolism, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Eur J Immunol. 2017;47:14–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Odak I, Barros-Martins J, Bošnjak B, Stahl K, David S, Wiesner O, et al. Reappearance of effector T cells is associated with recovery from COVID-19. EBioMedicine. 2020;57:102885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Sharma G, Bhattacharya M, Lee SS. SARS-CoV-2 causing pneumonia-associated respiratory disorder (COVID-19): diagnostic and proposed therapeutic options. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(7):4016–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saha RP, Sharma AR, Singh MK, Samanta S, Bhakta S, Mandal S, et al. Repurposing drugs, ongoing vaccine, and new therapeutic development initiatives against COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. 2020;395:473–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all health-care workers who were involved in the study but not listed as authors.

Funding

This study was partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82041022 to: G Cao), Science and Technology Commission Shanghai Municipality (20JC1410200; 20431900404 to: G Cao), and Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018ZX10101003-001-003 to: G Cao).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Peng-Hui Yang, Yi-Bo Ding, Zhe Xu, Rui Pu and Ping Li have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, China

    Peng-Hui Yang, Jin Yan, Ling-Xiang Yu, Zhao-Hai Wang, Zhi-Xian Hong, Zhao-Hui Xiao, Qing Xi, De-Xi Zhao, Peng Yu & Shao-Geng Zhang

  2. Treatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, China

    Zhe Xu, Fan-Ping Meng, Lei Huang, Lei Shi, Tian-Jun Jiang, En-Qiang Qin, Min Zhao, Da-Wei Zhang, Peng Zhao, Cai-Zhong Zhu, Zhu Chen, Jun-Sheng Ji & Fu-Sheng Wang

  3. Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China

    Yi-Bo Ding, Rui Pu, Ping Li, Ji-Luo Liu & Guang-Wen Cao

Authors
  1. Peng-Hui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi-Bo Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhe Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rui Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jin Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ji-Luo Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fan-Ping Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lei Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tian-Jun Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. En-Qiang Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Min Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Da-Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Peng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ling-Xiang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Zhao-Hai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Zhi-Xian Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Zhao-Hui Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Qing Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. De-Xi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Peng Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Cai-Zhong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Zhu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Shao-Geng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Jun-Sheng Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Fu-Sheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Guang-Wen Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GC, SZ, JJ, and FW conceived the study. GC, PY, YD, and FW designed the study. PY, ZX, JY, FM, LH, LS, TJ, EQ, MZ, DZ, PZ, LY, ZW, ZH, ZX, QX, DZ, PY, CY, and ZC acquired the original data. YD, RP, PL, JL, and GC analyzed the data. GC, SZ, JJ, FW, PY, YD, ZX, RP, and PL interpreted the findings. GC wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shao-Geng Zhang, Jun-Sheng Ji, Fu-Sheng Wang or Guang-Wen Cao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics commission of the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (2020032D). All subjects volunteered to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was waived for emerging infectious diseases.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure 1.

Chronology of symptom onset of the family clustering COVID-19 cases in Beijing and their contacts in Wuhan, Hubei province, China.

Additional file 2: Figure 2.

Consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to the study hospital. Wuhan-direct, the patients who traveled to Wuhan or came from Wuhan within 14 days before illness onset; Wuhan-indirect, the patients who ever exposed to a late—diagnosed patient from Wuhan within 14 days before illness onset; and no explicit contact history, the patients did not have the above 2 situations. Fourteen days after Wuhan quarantine, 7 patients were admitted and 3 of the 7 were from other countries.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, PH., Ding, YB., Xu, Z. et al. Increased circulating level of interleukin-6 and CD8+ T cell exhaustion are associated with progression of COVID-19. Infect Dis Poverty 9, 161 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40249-020-00780-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40249-020-00780-6

Keywords

Infectious Diseases of Poverty

ISSN: 2049-9957

Contact us