Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of study characteristics

From: Effectiveness of ivermectin mass drug administration in the control of soil-transmitted helminth infections in endemic populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Total studies included in systematic review

Ivermectin

Ivermectin and albendazole

All

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

8 (100)

17 (100)

25 (100)

Location

 Africa

1 (13)

14 (82)

15 (60)

 South America

3 (38)

2 (12)

5 (20)

 South-East Asia

0

1 (6)

1 (4)

 Western Pacific

4 (50)

0

4 (16)

Study populationa

 Children

2 (25)

6 (35)

8 (32)

 Adults

1 (13)

0

1 (4)

 Community

5 (63)

11 (65)

16 (64)

Diagnostic method

 Microscopy

5 (63)

15 (88)

20 (80)

 Molecular

2 (25)

1 (6)

3 (12)

 Serology

1 (13)

1 (6)

2 (8)

Primary disease target of preventive chemotherapyb

 Lymphatic filariasis

1 (13)

14 (82)

15 (60)

 Oesophagostomiasis

0

2 (12)

2 (8)

 Onchocerciasis

3 (38)

3 (18)

6 (24)

 Parasitic skin diseases or scabies

4 (50)

0

4 (16)

 Schistosomiasis

0

5 (29)

5 (20)

 Soil-transmitted helminths

0

9 (53)

9 (36)

Additional drugs used in preventive chemotherapy

 Azithromycin

1 (13)

0

1 (4)

 Diethylcarbamazine citrate

1 (13)

1 (6)

2 (8)

 Mebendazole

0

1 (6)

1 (4)

 Praziquantel

0

5 (29)

5 (20)

Ivermectin administration strategy

 School-based only

0

0

0

 Mass drug administration only

8 (100)

17 (100)

25 (100)

Albendazole administration strategy

 School-based only

NA

0

0

 Mass drug administration only

NA

13 (76)

13 (52)

 Both

NA

4 (24)

4 (16)

Number of rounds

 1

5 (63)

5 (29)

10 (40)

 2–5

2 (25)

10 (59)

12 (48)

 > 5

1 (13)

2 (12)

3 (12)

Follow-up time from last round

 ≤ 6 months

3 (38)

3 (18)

6 (24)

 > 6–12 months

3 (38)

7 (42)

10 (40)

 > 12–24 months

2 (25)

6 (35)

8 (32)

 > 24 months

0

1 (6)

1 (12)

Intervention coverage

 < 75%

0

8 (47)

8 (32)

 ≥ 75%

7 (88)

6 (35)

13 (52)

 Not reported

1 (13)

3 (18)

4 (16)

  1. NA not applicable
  2. aPopulation that was recruited for the prevalence surveys
  3. bNumber of studies may exceed total as some studies had multiple primary disease targets
  4. Percentages may exceed 100% due to rounding